oxman
10-03-2006, 10:40 PM
Marriage gap could sway elections
9/27/2006
Chris Stephens, The Plain Dealer
Republicans control 49 of the 50 congressional districts with the highest rates of married people.
DISTRICT BATTLES
Four of the five Republican House members with the lowest percentages
of married people in their districts are in competitive re-election races:
District Republican incumbent Pct. married
Ohio 1st Steve Chabot 48.3%
N.M. 1st Heather Wilson 51.1%
Ohio 15th Deborah Pryce 51.2%
Ariz. 5th J.D. Hayworth 51.6%
Source: National Journal ; Census Bureau; USA TODAY research
By Dennis Cauchon, USA TODAY
The wedding band could be crucial in this fall's congressional elections,
according to a USA TODAY analysis of 2005 Census data.
House districts held by Republicans are full of married people. Democratic districts are stacked with people who have never married. This "marriage gap" could play a role in the Nov. 7 congressional elections. Democrats need a net gain of 15 seats to take control of the House of Representatives.
Twenty-seven of the 38 Republican-held districts with seats considered vulnerable by independent political analysts have fewer married people than found in the average GOP district. The USA TODAY analysis also shows that:
• Republicans control 49 of the 50 districts with the highest rates of married people.
•Democrats represent all 50 districts that have the highest rates of adults who have never married.
The political tug-of-war is between people who are married and those who have never been.
The "never married" group covers a variety of groups who form the Democratic base: young people, those who marry late in life, single parents, gays, and heterosexuals who live together.
The marriage divide drew attention in the 2004 presidential race. President Bush beat John Kerry by 15 percentage points among married people and lost by 18 percentage points among unmarried people, according to an exit poll conducted by national news media organizations.
Most serious Democratic challenges this fall are in Republican-controlled House districts that have lower marriage rates.
For example, the two seats most likely to switch from Republican to Democratic are Arizona's 8th District and Colorado's 7th District, according to the non-partisan National Journal. The districts — in which Republican incumbents are not seeking re-election — rank 251st and 307th respectively in marriage rates among the 435 districts.
Of the five Republicans who have the lowest rates of married people in their districts,
four are in tough battles with Democrats.
On the other side, Rep. Melissa Bean, D-Ill., whose district has a high marriage rate, faces a strong GOP challenge.
Republicans control congressional districts that have the highest marriage rates; Democrats control those with the lowest.
The 5 districts that have the highest and lowest percentage of residents 15 and older who are married:
5 Highest percentage married
Rank District Party Representative Married
1 Ga. 7 Rep. John Linder 66.1%
2 Tenn. 7 Rep. Marsha Blackburn 65.3%
3 Ga. 6 Rep. Tom Price 65.0%
4 Colo. 6 Rep. Tom Tancredo 64.8%
5 N.J. 5 Rep. Scott Garrett 64.0%
5 Lowest percentage married
Rank District Party Representative Married
432 Ga. 5 Dem. John Lewis 37.3%
433 Mass. 8 Dem. Michael Capuano 37.2%
434 Pa. 1 Dem. Robert Brady 36.2%
435 Pa. 2 Dem. Chaka Fattah 35.9%
436 D.C. * Dem. Eleanor Holmes Norton 34.5%
Source: USA TODAY analysis of census Bureau data
8)
9/27/2006
Chris Stephens, The Plain Dealer
Republicans control 49 of the 50 congressional districts with the highest rates of married people.
DISTRICT BATTLES
Four of the five Republican House members with the lowest percentages
of married people in their districts are in competitive re-election races:
District Republican incumbent Pct. married
Ohio 1st Steve Chabot 48.3%
N.M. 1st Heather Wilson 51.1%
Ohio 15th Deborah Pryce 51.2%
Ariz. 5th J.D. Hayworth 51.6%
Source: National Journal ; Census Bureau; USA TODAY research
By Dennis Cauchon, USA TODAY
The wedding band could be crucial in this fall's congressional elections,
according to a USA TODAY analysis of 2005 Census data.
House districts held by Republicans are full of married people. Democratic districts are stacked with people who have never married. This "marriage gap" could play a role in the Nov. 7 congressional elections. Democrats need a net gain of 15 seats to take control of the House of Representatives.
Twenty-seven of the 38 Republican-held districts with seats considered vulnerable by independent political analysts have fewer married people than found in the average GOP district. The USA TODAY analysis also shows that:
• Republicans control 49 of the 50 districts with the highest rates of married people.
•Democrats represent all 50 districts that have the highest rates of adults who have never married.
The political tug-of-war is between people who are married and those who have never been.
The "never married" group covers a variety of groups who form the Democratic base: young people, those who marry late in life, single parents, gays, and heterosexuals who live together.
The marriage divide drew attention in the 2004 presidential race. President Bush beat John Kerry by 15 percentage points among married people and lost by 18 percentage points among unmarried people, according to an exit poll conducted by national news media organizations.
Most serious Democratic challenges this fall are in Republican-controlled House districts that have lower marriage rates.
For example, the two seats most likely to switch from Republican to Democratic are Arizona's 8th District and Colorado's 7th District, according to the non-partisan National Journal. The districts — in which Republican incumbents are not seeking re-election — rank 251st and 307th respectively in marriage rates among the 435 districts.
Of the five Republicans who have the lowest rates of married people in their districts,
four are in tough battles with Democrats.
On the other side, Rep. Melissa Bean, D-Ill., whose district has a high marriage rate, faces a strong GOP challenge.
Republicans control congressional districts that have the highest marriage rates; Democrats control those with the lowest.
The 5 districts that have the highest and lowest percentage of residents 15 and older who are married:
5 Highest percentage married
Rank District Party Representative Married
1 Ga. 7 Rep. John Linder 66.1%
2 Tenn. 7 Rep. Marsha Blackburn 65.3%
3 Ga. 6 Rep. Tom Price 65.0%
4 Colo. 6 Rep. Tom Tancredo 64.8%
5 N.J. 5 Rep. Scott Garrett 64.0%
5 Lowest percentage married
Rank District Party Representative Married
432 Ga. 5 Dem. John Lewis 37.3%
433 Mass. 8 Dem. Michael Capuano 37.2%
434 Pa. 1 Dem. Robert Brady 36.2%
435 Pa. 2 Dem. Chaka Fattah 35.9%
436 D.C. * Dem. Eleanor Holmes Norton 34.5%
Source: USA TODAY analysis of census Bureau data
8)